I don’t mind rejection, but not when it seems arbitrary. Ah, the whim of editors. One declined my manuscript because her pet peeve is present tense, and she’s also looking for multicultural stories, so ultimately, mine doesn’t work for her. Not much I can do about that, especially considering it’s NOT in present tense.
Another praised “the charmingly universal quality” of the novel, and the family, which she found “endearing and infuriating all at once,” and the worries and desires of the narrator rang familiar and true, but she didn’t like the narrator’s voice. Not much I can do about that, either.
At least neither editor mentioned any glaring flaws such as boring plot, overly sentimental writing, or the ending sucked. Their rejections strike me as subjective. The good news is two have asked for more time (which my agent happily granted) and she has yet to hear from the majority of editors.
Meanwhile, I keep slogging away.
Mihku Paul says
Well, hey Linda. I can’t wait for the day when I can actually
SAY that two editors declined my manuscript. You are on the highway, and I’m still crawling up the on-ramp.
Thanks for sharing your journey. Hang in there.
Linda K Sienkiewicz says
I feel like I’m stuck in a traffic jam at the moment, hampered by the orange barrels of editor’s personal preferences!
NyNy says
Multicultural stories are hard to find in my opinion – well the ones I try to find I want them to link to interracial relationships specifically AMBW. A really good post may I say 🙂 By the way, I wrote a post about my own fiction pet peeves on my blog so I hope you will read and comment with your own! http://nynyonlinex.wordpress.com/2013/03/06/fiction-pet-peeves/
Linda K Sienkiewicz says
Thank you for your kind words, and thanks for stopping by and leaving a comment! I’ll check out your blog!